Discovering Results of men and Specialists
Thinking about feeder selection, i learned that, separate of coaching protocol, one another males and you will experts clearly increased the alternatives accuracy over the course of the training per along with few put ( Fig. 2 ).
Throughout the training there was no significant difference in the choice accuracy of males and workers (effect of sex on choice accuracy on the initial and final 10 visits of the sequentially presented colour pairs in the sequence: first colour pair: initial: t112 = 0.51, P = 0.61; final: t110 = 0.04, P = 0.97; second: initial: t97 = 0.65, P = 0.52; final: t93 = 0.95, P = 0.35; third: initial: t89 = ?1.59, P = 0.12; final: t85 = ?0.84, P = 0.41; fourth: initial: t81 = ?0.47, P = 0.64; final: t79 = 0.11, P = 0.91; Fig. 2 ). 7 12.9% (males) and 86.5 13.9% (workers) correct choices (t109 = 0.48, P < 0.63).>
(a) Indicate rust ongoing t in the understanding bend ( SE) of men (black gray squares) and you may specialists (light gray groups) because the a purpose of colour point on hexagonal bee along with space. New t well worth was inversely coordinated to the reading rates that have highest t opinions symbolizing sluggish reading speed and you may the other way around (since represented by gray arrow).